Tuning-Math messages 651 - 675

This is an Opt In Archive . We would like to hear from you if you want your posts included. For the contact address see About this archive. All posts are copyright (c).

Contents Hide Contents S 1

Previous Next

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950

650 - 675 -



top of page bottom of page down


Message: 651

Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 19:44:08

Subject: Re: Another BP linear temperament

From: Paul Erlich

--- In tuning-math@y..., "D.Stearns" <STEARNS@C...> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> <<Ok. But for this to be a "generalised meantone" in any sense other
> than the one which is much better described by the term "linear
> temperament", then a chain of _four_ 9/7's would have to be
> tritave-equivalent to a 7/6. It needs a chain of five according to
> your comma.>>
> 
> I disagree, and I think your looking at this in much too narrow a 
way.
> The process of determining a comma and fractionalizing and
> distributing it is what's being generalized...

But no one ever called schismic temperament, which seems to have 
predated meantone, a "generalized meantone" . . .
> 
> Again, it's a generalization of meantone because the "tone" and the
> "mean" are generalized!

Ah . . . this may be what Dave and I are missing. What are the 
JI "tones" here?

Anyway, let's not let squabbles over terminology (Margo suggested 
some nice ideas for this) blind us to the fact that all of the others 
on this list have great pools of insight from which they are drawing.


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 671

Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 19:56:20

Subject: Re: Hi! Seeking advice

From: Paul Erlich

--- In tuning-math@y..., BobWendell@t... wrote:
> Thanks so much, Paul! I feel very fortunate indeed to have run 
across 
> you all here. I was hoping for some kind of more coherent 
> presentation format

I trust you've read the _Gentle Introduction to Fokker Periodicity 
Blocks_ (A gentle introduction to Fokker periodicity blocks, part 1, *)?


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 674

Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 03:06:12

Subject: Re: Microtemperament and scale structure

From: genewardsmith@j...

Apparently the math stuff belongs here, so I am reposting it in case 
anyone wants to follow up.

--- In tuning@y..., kalleaho@m... wrote:

> I understand that with microtemperament one can achieve greater 
> number of consonant intervals in a scale that is originally tuned 
in 
> strict Just Intonation. 

> This can be a great method for generating new and interesting 
scales 
> but doesn't it destroy the structure of the original scale?

When you finally get to the point where you can't tell the 
difference, the question becomes moot. However, the answer is yes--
introducing approximations increases the flexibility of harmonic 
relationships and thereby changes the structure. The question is 
really best understood in terms of group theory.

The intervals of any form of just intonation are by definition 
positive rational numbers, and so an element of the abelian group of 
positive rationals under multiplication (since our hearing, and hence 
musical structure, is multiplicative.) We are never really interested 
in all rational numbers, but can content ourselves with a finitely 
generated subgroup--for one easy example, the group G of all the 
numbers of the form 2^a * 3^b * 5^c, where a, b and c are integers, 
are the numbers generated by the first three primes, 2, 3 and 5. 

An approximate tuning system can very often be seen as a (subset of 
a) group homomorphism to a group of smaller rank, and most 
significantly to a group of rank 1. For another easy example, the 
rank 3 free group G can be sent to a rank 1 free group by a 
homomorphism h12(2) = 12, h12(3) = 19, h12(5) = 28. A subset of 88 
contiguous elements of this group associated to notes tuned as usual 
by setting g12(1) = 440 hz, g12(2) = 2*440 hz, g12(3) = 2^19/12*440 
hz, g12(5) = 2^28/12*440 hz is the standard keyboard. 

Any such homomorphism is defined by its kernel, which are the 
elements sent to the identity. In the case of h12, the kernel is 
spanned by 81/80 (the diatonic comma) and 128/125 (the great diesis), 
where we have h12(81/80) = h12(128/125) = 0. A tuning system which 
does not contain the diatonic comma in its kernel (and this includes 
just intonation!) will have a structure quite different that which 
musicians normally expect. On the other hand one that does, such as 
what we get from the 19 or 31 tone system, will seem more "normal". 

Consider the system h72(2) = 72, h72(3) = 114, h72(5) = 167, h72(7) = 
202, h72(11) = 249 (the last two values are irrelevant here, but they 
do no harm and they cover the range of primes which makes the 72 
system interesting.) This 72 system has a 12 system tuning embedded 
in it, so we could suppose that structurally they are very similar. 
However, intersecting the kernels shows they are remotely related; in 
particular h72(81/80) = 1 and h72(128/125) = 3, the second is not so 
important but the first shows that the 72 system is fundamentally 
different in structure from the 12 system. In contrast, h31(2) = 31, 
h31(3) = 49, h31(5) = 72, h31(7) = 87 and h31(11) = 107 *does* have 
the property that h31(81/80) = 0; and while h31(128/125) = 1 we still 
find h31 is much closer in structre to h12 than is h72.


top of page bottom of page up

Previous Next

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950

650 - 675 -

top of page