This is an Opt In Archive . We would like to hear from you if you want your posts included. For the contact address see About this archive. All posts are copyright (c).
Contents Hide Contents S 65000 5050 5100 5150 5200 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950
5600 - 5625 -
Message: 5627 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 03:08:00 Subject: Re: Adaptive JI notated on staff From: monz hi George, > From: "gdsecor" <gdsecor@xxxxx.xxx> > To: <tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:24 AM > Subject: [tuning-math] Re: Adaptive JI notated on staff > > > --- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <monz@a...> wrote: > > i added Dave's graphic and a MIDI-file of it to my > > "adaptive-JI" definition: > > > > Definitions of tuning terms: adaptive JI, (c) 2000 by Joe Monzo * > > > > -monz > > Monz, > > We appreciate your doing this. > > Just one problem: the graphic is out of date. We've changed three > of the symbols in the 217-ET standard set since that it was made. > This includes adoption of the alternate 8deg symbol as the standard > one. You should use this graphic instead: > > Yahoo groups: /tuning- * > math/files/secor/notation/AdaptJI.gif done. thanks. -monz
Message: 5637 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:15:12 Subject: Re: Paul's new names From: Carl Lumma >there are several different versions of complexity. Has there been any discussion on where we disagree on complexity? What are the main formualtions, and how desirable is it that we pick one? -Carl
5000 5050 5100 5150 5200 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950
5600 - 5625 -