This is an Opt In Archive . We would like to hear from you if you want your posts included. For the contact address see About this archive. All posts are copyright (c).
Contents Hide Contents S 1211000 11050 11100 11150 11200 11250 11300 11350 11400
11050 - 11075 -
Message: 11050 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:12:40 Subject: Re: The diaschismic family From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...> wrote: > > > Well enough, but please take a step back, Gene. Herman was starting > > with 7-limit shrutar, and trying to construct 11-limit shrutar from > > it. But the tuning was originally defined as an 11-limit one, and > > that's what I was asking about. Instead of an answer, we're going > > around in circles. All I remember for sure is that 896/891 and > > 2048/2025 vanish. > > It's h46/\h22 =<<4 -8 14 -2 -22 11 -17 55 23 -54||, and 896/891 and > 2048/2025 do indeed vanish, though the TM basis is actually > {121/120, 176/175, 245/243}. Oh, so it's not considered part of the diaschismic family because its generator is only half the diaschismic one (yes?) . . .
Message: 11052 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:32:10 Subject: Re: Family commas From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...> wrote: > > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> > > wrote: > > > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > How is it possible to get contorsion from commas? I don't think > > it is. > > > > > > Interpreting the GCD > 1 to mean contorsion rather than torsion > > seems > > > to make the most sense if you are considering it as representing a > > > temperament. You get torsion out of 648/625 and 2048/2025, but you > > > could also count it as contorsion by taking the <24 38 56| val > > > literally, as 24-equal, being contorted 12-equal, so that the > > mapping > > > of the 5-limit is not surjective. > > > > Yes, exactly! But this is not coming from commas, it's coming from a > > val!! > > And I got the val from the commas. But if you go directly from the commas, it's unequivocally torsion and not contorsion. Remember, soon after your joining, that Fokker periodicity block, that you initially said represented 24-equal, but then you retracted that and said it was really 12-equal with torsion?
Message: 11061 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:00:24 Subject: 41 "Hermanic" 7-limit linear temperaments (was: Re: 114 7-limit temperaments) From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Number 10 Tripletone > > > > > > > > > > > > [3, 0, -6, -7, -18, -14] [[3, 5, 7, 8], [0, -1, 0, 2]] > > > > > > TOP tuning [1197.060039, 1902.640406, 2793.140092, > > 3377.079420] > > > > > > TOP generators [399.0200131, 92.45965769] > > > > > > bad: 8.4214 comp: 4.045351 err: 2.939961 > > > > > > I'm suggesting calling this "augmented", since the TOP generators > > are > > > close to 5-limit augmented. > > > > Makes some sense, but somewhere out there there's something even > > closer -- an infinite number of somethings, I think. > > Only at the cost of ever-increasing complexity. If we cap badness to > something reasonable, we get only a few possibilities, or sometimes > only one. However, here both "augie" and "tripletone" are live > possibilities. It can be even worse than you might think in a sense, > since more than one temperament can have the same TOP generators. > Consider the following three versions of meantone: > > <<1 4 10 4 13 12|| [<1 2 4 7|, <0 -1 -4 -10|] > > <<1 4 41 4 62 84|| [<1 2 4 20|, <0 -1 -4 -41|] > > <<1 4 -164 4 -262 -292|| [<1 2 4 -66|, <0 -1 -4 164|] > > All have the same TOP tuning, but it is clear which one we prefer. In some cases the choice might not be so clear. > > > > > > > > IN > > > > > > Number 16 > > > > > > > > > > > > [6, 10, 10, 2, -1, -5] [[2, 4, 6, 7], [0, -3, -5, -5]] > > > > > > TOP tuning [1196.893422, 1906.838962, 2779.100462, > > 3377.547174] > > > > > > TOP generators [598.4467109, 162.3159606] > > > > > > bad: 8.9422 comp: 4.306766 err: 3.106578 > > > > > > This one needs a name. The TM basis is {50/49, 245/243}. > > Erethezontic? > > > > Where does that come from? We were calling this "Biporky", but of > > course we'd like something better. > > It's from the name for the porcupine family, Erethizontidae. Don't > know if it is better. How about something related to a porcupine, like say "hedgehog"?
Message: 11063 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:02:52 Subject: Re: Family commas From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...> wrote: > > > But if you go directly from the commas, it's unequivocally torsion > > and not contorsion. Remember, soon after your joining, that Fokker > > periodicity block, that you initially said represented 24-equal, but > > then you retracted that and said it was really 12-equal with torsion? > > Which is why I picked this example. If we are thinking Fokker blocks, > it is torsion; however why do we have to be thinking Fokker blocks? Who said anything about Fokker blocks? If you start with JI (as true temperaments do), and then temper out the two commas in question, you end up with 12-equal, not 24-equal. It's that simple. > Admittedly, the contorsion interpretation may be a little articifical, > but there's nothing else for it to be, basically. ??
Message: 11064 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:02:55 Subject: Re: Paul's nifty fifty From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...> wrote: > > > If a porcupine is a member of the erethezontic family, wouldn't that > > falsely suggest that one temperament is more general than the other? > > "Hedgehog" seems good. > > > > Minorsemi from the approximate 21/20 generator, and > > > duodecal because like waage it's got 12 on the brain. > > > > What happened to "catler"? > > I forgot about it. Is the attribution of this to Catler securely >based? Well, his tuning is very different from TOP, but the addition of 7- limit notes at a fixed offset from a basic 12-equal 5-limit system is clearly the basis behind the FreeNote 12-tone-plus guitars. > > > [2, 8, 1, 8, -4, -20] hemifourths > > semifourths, I think. > > OK. > > > > > 135/128 pelogic > > mavila. > > Is that one "l" or two? One. > > > 6561/6250 ragisemi > > A little too wild. > > "Ragisemitonic" seems worse; what about "ragitonic"? See message 8331 > for this comma. I remember you mentioned it was a ragisma off from 21/20. That's what I see as a little too wild -- bringing in all these 7-limit intervals when we're still in 5-limit land. > > > 262144/253125 tertiatonic > > meaning? > > It's another 12-et comma, which I couldn't find a name for when I was > considering 12-note Fokker blocks. The name comes from the fact that > it is a third of a tone--see > > Yahoo groups: /tuning-math/message/8338 * This seems to go against the grain -- if the comma vanishes, it's not a third of any nonzero interval. > > > 393216/390625 wuerschmidt > > > 531441/524288 aristoxenan > > compton. > > This is the second time you've wanted to change this one. :) As I've mentioned before, Carl pointed out the Compton reference for this, and it seems the earliest we have.
Message: 11065 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:09:58 Subject: Re: Paul's nifty fifty From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > Here is what I am suggesting for names for Paul's list of 50 > temperaments. Thanks. > Septischismic in place of schismic, augie in the place > of augmented, and erethezontic in the place of biporky have been > discussed. If a porcupine is a member of the erethezontic family, wouldn't that falsely suggest that one temperament is more general than the other? > Minorsemi from the approximate 21/20 generator, and > duodecal because like waage it's got 12 on the brain. What happened to "catler"? > > In the 5-limit, the names minorsemi and tertiatonic come from the > discussion of 12-note 5-limit Fokker blocks around tuning-math 8300 to > 8400. Superpythagorean corresponds to the 7-limit name, and corrects a > typo for the comma. > > [1, 4, 10, 4, 13, 12] meantone > [5, 1, 12, -10, 5, 25] magic > [2, -4, -4, -11, -12, 2] pajara > [7, 9, 13, -2, 1, 5] semisixths > [1, 4, -2, 4, -6, -16] dominant sevenths > [2, 8, 8, 8, 7, -4] injera > [6, 5, 3, -6, -12, -7] kleismic > [2, 8, 1, 8, -4, -20] hemifourths semifourths, I think. > [4, -3, 2, -14, -8, 13] negri > [3, 0, -6, -7, -18, -14] augmented > [1, -8, -14, -15, -25, -10] septischismic? > [1, 9, -2, 12, -6, -30] superpythagorean > [7, -3, 8, -21, -7, 27] orwell > [3, 0, 6, -7, 1, 14] augie > [3, 5, -6, 1, -18, -28] porcupine > [6, 10, 10, 2, -1, -5] erethezontic? > [3, 12, -1, 12, -10, -36] supermajor seconds Anyone have another suggestion? > [1, 4, -9, 4, -17, -32] flattone > [4, 4, 4, -3, -5, -2] diminished > [6, 10, 3, 2, -12, -21] minorsemi? > [0, 0, 12, 0, 19, 28] duodecal? > [3, 12, 11, 12, 9, -8] gawel > [10, 9, 7, -9, -17, -9] nonkleismic > [6, -7, -2, -25, -20, 15] miracle > [2, -9, -4, -19, -12, 16] beatles > [6, -2, -2, -17, -20, 1] lemba > [8, 6, 6, -9, -13, -3] doublewide > [0, 5, 0, 8, 0, -14] blackwood > [18, 27, 18, 1, -22, -34] ennealimmal > > > 25/24 dicot > 81/80 meantone > 128/125 augmented > 135/128 pelogic mavila. > 250/243 porcupine > 256/243 blackwood > 648/625 diminished > 2048/2025 diaschismic > 3125/3072 magic > 6561/6250 ragisemi A little too wild. > 15625/15552 hanson > 16875/16384 negri > 20000/19683 tetracot > 20480/19683 superpythagorean > 32805/32768 schismic > 78732/78125 semisixths > 262144/253125 tertiatonic meaning? > 393216/390625 wuerschmidt > 531441/524288 aristoxenan compton. > 1600000/1594323 amity > 2109375/2097152 orwell
Message: 11073 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:38:15 Subject: Re: Paul's nifty fifty From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Herman Miller <hmiller@I...> wrote: > Paul Erlich wrote: > > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> > > wrote: > >>Septischismic in place of schismic, augie in the place > >>of augmented, and erethezontic in the place of biporky have been > >>discussed. > > > > > > If a porcupine is a member of the erethezontic family, wouldn't that > > falsely suggest that one temperament is more general than the other? > > Actually, "porcupine" is more general; there are New World porcupines > (Erethizontidae) (note the "i": not "Erethezontidae") and Old World > porcupines (Hystricidae). So if <<3, 5, 1, 1, -7, -12]] is tentatively > "Hystrix", maybe <<6, 10, 10, 2, -1, -5]] could be "Erethizon". > > >>[3, 12, -1, 12, -10, -36] supermajor seconds > > > > Anyone have another suggestion? > > Trimeantone? (3 generators = a meantone fifth) > Or just plain supermajor? If you ignore the 5 axis, this temperament has been referred to as "wonder" and "slendric" -- correct? ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: Yahoo groups: /tuning-math/ * <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: tuning-math-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: Yahoo! Terms of Service *
11000 11050 11100 11150 11200 11250 11300 11350 11400
11050 - 11075 -