Tuning-Math Digests messages 1050 - 1074

This is an Opt In Archive . We would like to hear from you if you want your posts included. For the contact address see About this archive. All posts are copyright (c).

Contents Hide Contents S 2

Previous Next

1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950

1050 - 1075 -



top of page bottom of page down


Message: 1050

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 18:39:50

Subject: Re: Hypothesis revisited

From: monz

I have a question for all of you mathematicians.

I've just put up a Dictionary entry for LucyTuning.
Definitions of tuning terms: LucyTuning, (c) 2001 by Joe Monzo *


In it, I'd like to provide the calculation for the
ratio of the LucyTuning "5th".  Can this be simplified?:

( 2^(3 / (2*PI) ) )  *  ( {2 / [2^(5 / (2*PI) ) ] } ^(1/2) )



-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"


 




_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at Yahoo! Mail Setup *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1052

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 19:20:54

Subject: Re: Hypothesis revisited

From: monz

> From: Paul Erlich <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: <tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:00 PM
> Subject: [tuning-math] Re: Hypothesis revisited
>

> I think so. The LucyTuning "major third" is 2^(1/pi).
> Add two octaves to form the "major seventeenth": 2^(2+1/pi).
> Take the fourth root (since it's a meantone, the fifth
> will be the fourth root of the major seventeenth):
> 2^(1/2 + 1/(4*pi)). Is that right?


Thanks for this great explanation, Paul.

Your answer is slightly different from the one Ed Borasky
calculated with Derive:

  2^( (2*pi) + 1 / (4*pi) )



-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"


 



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at Yahoo! Mail Setup *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1054

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 06:37:16

Subject: Re: Hypothesis revisited

From: Dave Keenan

--- In tuning-math@y..., "Orphon Soul, Inc." <tuning@o...> wrote:
> On 6/29/01 7:48 PM, "Dave Keenan" <D.KEENAN@U...> wrote:
> 
> >> 31                        10
> >> 
> >> 
> >>              41
> >> 
> >>       72            51
> >> 
> >>    93    113    91      61
> > 
> 
> Shouldn't the bottom line be 103, 113, 92, 61?

Oh yes. Well spotted!


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1056

Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 02:00:00

Subject: Re: Hypothesis revisited

From: Paul Erlich

--- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> I have a question for all of you mathematicians.
> 
> I've just put up a Dictionary entry for LucyTuning.
> Definitions of tuning terms: LucyTuning, (c) 2001 by Joe Monzo *
> 
> 
> In it, I'd like to provide the calculation for the
> ratio of the LucyTuning "5th".  Can this be simplified?:
> 
> ( 2^(3 / (2*PI) ) )  *  ( {2 / [2^(5 / (2*PI) ) ] } ^(1/2) )

I think so. The LucyTuning "major third" is 2^(1/pi). Add two octaves to form the "major 
seventeenth": 2^(2+1/pi). Take the fourth root (since it's a meantone, the fifth will be the fourth 
root of the major seventeenth): 2^(1/2 + 1/(4*pi)). Is that right?


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1057

Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 18:55:12

Subject: Re: Hypothesis revisited

From: Paul Erlich

--- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> 
> > From: Paul Erlich <paul@s...>
> > To: <tuning-math@y...>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:00 PM
> > Subject: [tuning-math] Re: Hypothesis revisited
> >
> 
> > I think so. The LucyTuning "major third" is 2^(1/pi).
> > Add two octaves to form the "major seventeenth": 2^(2+1/pi).
> > Take the fourth root (since it's a meantone, the fifth
> > will be the fourth root of the major seventeenth):
> > 2^(1/2 + 1/(4*pi)). Is that right?
> 
> 
> Thanks for this great explanation, Paul.
> 
> Your answer is slightly different from the one Ed Borasky
> calculated with Derive:
> 
>   2^( (2*pi) + 1 / (4*pi) )
> 
It's completely different.

2^( (2*pi) + 1 / (4*pi) ) = 82.2967 = 7635.3¢

2^(1/2 + 1/(4*pi)) = 1.4944 = 695.49¢


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1058

Date: 2 Jul 2001 17:58:59 -0700

Subject: 17-tone PB and Justin White's question

From: paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx

Forwarded is a question from Justin White.

He refers to <http://www.anaphoria.com/genus.PDF - Ok *>. On the bottoms of pages
15, 19, 20, and 23, there is a lattice of Wilson's famous 17-tone scale,
which is clearly a periodicity block with unison vectors schisma and
chromatic semitone; i.e.,

[8 1]

and

[-1 2].


Anyone like to tackle Justin's question below? Justin, if you're reading
this, you might like to join tuning-math to see what responses this
generates!


-----Original Message-----
From: Justin White [mailto:justin.white@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx 
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:53 AM
To: Paul H. Erlich
Subject: Re: adaptive tuning. Can a computer pick a melody from the
harmony ?





Hello Paul, Thanks for your offer of assistance with this one. Have you read
Erv
Wilsons paper "Some Basic Patterns Underlying Genus 12 & 17"?

--- In tuning@y..., "Justin White" <justin.white@d...> wrote:
>>
>> Yes I was attracted to this scale. I thought of creating a scale in
the smae
>> manner using a septimal tetrachord...I haven't found a tetrachord
that will give
>> me the tetrad s I want yet.

>Can you explain what you're trying to do? Maybe I can help.


What I want to do is use the same methodology to create a [septimal] subset
of
the scale I have posted below.


0.  1/1
1   25/24
2.  135/128
3.  35/32
4.  9/8
5.  7/6
6.  75/64
7.  1215/1024
8.  6/5
9.  315/256
10. 5/4
11. 81/64
12. 21/16
13. 675/512
14. 4/3
15. 7/5
16. 45/32
17. 35/24
18. 189/128
19. 3/2
20. 25/16
21. 405/256
22. 8/5
23. 105/64
24. 5/3
25. 27/16
26. 7/4
27. 225/128
28. 9/5
29. 945/512
30. 15/8
31. 243/128
32. 63/32
33. 2/1

Note how Wilsons genus 17 [see below] contains mostly notes from the above
superset [B&C's blue melodic reference]

0.  1/1
1.  135/128
2.  10/9
3.  9/8
4.  1215
5.  5/4
6.  81/80
7.  4/3
8.  45/32.
9.  729/512
10 .3/2
11. 405/256
12. 5/3
13. 27/16
14. 3645/2048
15. 15/8
16. 243/128
17. 2/1

The columns below are to indicate what ratios are more important than
others.
The notes in the left hand column should be used before the  notes in the
right
hand column.  [This is to do with th e chain of reference used in that
scale.]

1/1
9/8            45/32           135/128           405/256
1215/1024
7/6            35/24
6/5
5/4            25/16             75/64              225/128
675/256
4/3
7/5                                     21/16               63/32
189/128
3/2            15/8
8/5            25/24
5/3
7/4            35/32           105/64              315/256
945/512
9/5                                     27/16                81/64
243/128


I'd be interested to see what you make of it all.



Best wishes,

Justin White


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1059

Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:45:13

Subject: Re: interval set of Dowland's tuning

From: monz

--- In tuning-math@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

Yahoo groups: /tuning-math/message/477 *

>  
> Hello all.  I was just working on my paper on John Dowland's
> Lute Fretting (to be delivered in Italy on September 13,
> Wim Hoogewerf performing).


Oops... totally my bad.  First of all, I didn't have a
subject line on that post.


> I made a graph of the entire set of intervals available
> between any two pitches on Dowland's fretboard, which I've
> posted here:
>
Yahoo groups: /tuning- *
math/files/monz/dowland_lute_fretting.xls


Secondly, as you can see by the file extension, this is
not simply a .gif graphic of the chart, but rather the
entire Excel spreadsheet.

I thought that would make things easier for you math-heads
to get right to work on it!  :)



-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"


 



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at Yahoo! Mail Setup *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1060

Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:48:44

Subject: Re: interval set of Dowland's tuning

From: monz

> From: monz <joemonz@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: <tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 9:40 PM
>
>
> 
> 
> Yahoo groups: /tuning- *
> math/files/monz/dowland_lute_fretting.xls
> 
> (copy/paste the broken link, remove break, copy/paste into
> browser)
> 
> 
> I created minor gridlines along the y-axis to represent
> 1/8-tones, because I was struck by the way nearly all the
> intervals cluster between +/- ~25 cents from each 12-EDO
> pitch-_gestalt_.


Oops... my bad yet again.  Of course, I meant "=/- ~25 cents
from each 12-EDO *interval*-_gestalt_.



-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"


 



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at Yahoo! Mail Setup *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1061

Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 22:00:30

Subject: Re: Lucytuning "5th" (was: Re Hypothesis revisited)

From: monz

> From: Paul Erlich <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: <tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:55 AM
> Subject: [tuning-math] Re: Hypothesis revisited
>
>
> It's completely different.
>
> 2^( (2*pi) + 1 / (4*pi) ) = 82.2967 = 7635.3¢
>
> 2^(1/2 + 1/(4*pi)) = 1.4944 = 695.49¢


Hmmm... oddly enough, Paul, when I plugged
both of these formulas into Excel they gave the
same result!  (the latter of your two)

My choice of additional parentheses must have made
the difference.  Here are the exact Excel formulas,
which require PI to have an empty argument: PI() .

=2^((2*PI()+1)/(4*PI()))

=2^((1/2)+(1/(4*PI())))


Is there any way to decide which of the two is
more elegant?  Does it matter at all?  Can you
explain why they work out to the same ratio?



-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"






_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at Yahoo! Mail Setup *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1064

Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 04:40:18

Subject: (unknown)

From: monz

Hello all.  I was just working on my paper on John Dowland's
Lute Fretting (to be delivered in Italy on September 13,
Wim Hoogewerf performing).

See my old webpage on this, which I'm using as a basis
for expansion:
John Dowland's Lute Fretting  (c)1998 by Joe Monzo *

I made a graph of the entire set of intervals available
between any two pitches on Dowland's fretboard, which I've
posted here:

Yahoo groups: /tuning- *
math/files/monz/dowland_lute_fretting.xls

(copy/paste the broken link, remove break, copy/paste into
browser)


I created minor gridlines along the y-axis to represent
1/8-tones, because I was struck by the way nearly all the
intervals cluster between +/- ~25 cents from each 12-EDO
pitch-_gestalt_.

I'd appreciate some mathematical formalizations of this.
I'm very intrigued by this observation.  Any ideas?



-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1065

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 10:40:04

Subject: periodicity block definition

From: carl@xxxxx.xxx

Hello all,

The periodicity block must be one of the most useful
constructs with which to understand musical tuning.
The choice of unison vectors, the effects this choice
have on the resulting PBs, must be one of the most basic
areas of inquiry here.  Here, I would like to present
some points for discussion (and/or clarification)...

() Do we consider any intervals valid as unison vectors,
even if they are very large?  If so, do we have a name
for PBs that have small unison vectors (i.e. "well
formed" PBs...).

() Do we have precise ideas on what counts as "small"
and "large" when it comes to unison vectors?  What
properties are associated with them?  For example, I
think Erlich and I managed to show a while back that
PBs with unison vectors smaller than their smallest 2nds
share certain properties with MOS.

() How are the above affected by the decision to
temper out some or all of the unison vectors?  For
example, what happens when there are commatic unison
vectors larger than any chromatic ones?

-Carl


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1066

Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 16:21:53

Subject: Re: periodicity block definition

From: monz

I was playing around with an interval conversion calculator
I created in an Excel spreadsheet, and I happened to notice
that 5 enharmonic dieses [= (128/125)^5] are almost the
same size as a 9:8 whole-tone.

enharmonic diesis  = (2^7)*(5^-3) = ~41.05885841 cents

5 enharmonic dieses = (2^35)*(5^-15) =  ~205.294292 cents

9/8 = (2^-3)*(3^2) = ~203.9100017 cents


difference:  ((128/125)^5) / (9/8)  = 

   2^x 3^y 5^z

  | 35  0  -15|
- |- 3  2    0|
  -------------
  | 38 -2  -15|

= (2^38)*(3^-2)*(5^-15) = ~1.384290297 cents = ~1&3/8 cents.


Has anyone ever noticed this before, or used it as a unison-vector?
Any comments?  I'd like to see a periodicity-block derived from it.


-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"


 



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at Yahoo! Mail Setup *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1067

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:13:19

Subject: Naming intervals using Miracle

From: David C Keenan

The Miracle temperament gives us a logical way of further extending the
Fokker extended-diatonic interval-names from 31-EDO to Miracle chains, and
hence to 41-EDO, 72-EDO and 11-limit JI.

Previously there was no obvious way of deciding which of a pair of nearby
intervals (such as the neutral seconds 10:11 and 11:12 or the minor
sevenths 5:9 and 9:16) should be called "wide" or "narrow", and which
should be unmodified. Now the answer is obvious. The unmodified one is the
one that is represented within a chain of +-15 Miracle generators. i.e. The
intervals available in Miracle-31 should be named the same as in 31-EDO,
without using "wide" or "narrow".

The table below shows how this scheme names the intervals of 72-EDO.

Legend for interval names:

1 unison
2 second
3 third
4 fourth
5 fifth
6 sixth
7 seventh
8 octave

m = minor
N = neutral
M = major

d = diminished
P = perfect
A = augmented

s = sub
S = super

n = narrow
W = wide

Legend for note names:

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,#,b as for 12-tET
] = quarter-tone up   (+50 c)
> = sixth-tone   up   (+33 c)
^ = twelfth-tone up   (+17 c)
v = twelfth-tone down (-17 c)
< = sixth-tone   down (-33 c)
[ = quarter-tone down (-50 c)

No.	Cents	Intvl	Note	11-limit
gens          name	frm C	Ratio
---------------------------------
0	0	  P1	C	1:1
31	17	  W1	C^	
-10	33	  S1	C>	
21	50	 WS1	C]	
-20	67	nsm2	C#<	
11	83	 sm2	C#v	
-30	100	 nm2	C#	
1	117	  m2	C#^	
32	133	 Wm2	C#>	
-9	150	  N2	D[	11:12
22	167	 WN2	D<	10:11
-19	183	 nM2	Dv	9:10
12	200	  M2	D	8:9
-29	217	nSM2	D^	
2	233	 SM2	D>	7:8
33	250	WSM2	D]	
-8	267	 sm3	Eb<	6:7
23	283	Wsm3	Ebv	
-18	300	 nm3	Eb	
13	317	  m3	Eb^	5:6
-28	333	 nN3	Eb>	
3	350	  N3	E[	9:11
34	367	 WN3	E<	
-7	383	  M3	E	4:5
24	400	 WM3	E	
-17	417	nSM3	E^	11:14
14	433	 SM3	E>	7:9
-27	450	 ns4	F[	
4	467	  s4	F<	
35	483	 Ws4	Fv	
-6	500	  P4	F	3:4
25	517	 WP4	F^	
-16	533	 nS4	F>	
15	550	  S4	F]	8:11
-26	567	 nA4	F#<	
5	583	  A4	F#v	5:7
+-36	600  WA4/nd5  F#	
-5	617	  d5	F#^	7:10
26	633	 Wd5	F#>	
-15	650	  s5	G[	11:16
16	667	 Ws5	G<	
-25	683	 nP5	Gv	
6	700	  P5	G	2:3
-35	717	 nS5	G^	
-4	733	  S5	G>	
27	750	 WS5	G]	
-14	767	 sm6	G#<	9:14
17	783	Wsm6	G#v	7:11
-24	800	 nm6	G#	
7	817	  m6	G#^	5:8
-34	833	 nN6	G#>	
-3	850	  N6	A[	11:18
28	867	 WN6	A<	
-13	883	  M6	Av	3:5
18	900	 WM6	A	
-23	917	nSM6	A^	
8	933	 SM6	A>	7:12
-33	950	nsm7	A]	
-2	967	 sm7	Bb<	4:7
29	983	Wsm7	Bbv	
-12	1000	  m7	Bb	9:16
19	1017	 Wm7	Bb^	5:9
-22	1033	 nN7	Bb>	11:20
9	1050	  N7	B[	6:11
-32	1067	 nM7	B<	
-1	1083	  M7	Bv	
30	1100	 WM7	B	
-11	1117	 SM7	B^	
20	1133	WSM7	B>	
-21	1150	 ns8	C[	
10	1167	  s8	C<	
-31	1183	  n8	Cv	

Does anyone feel that any of these names are somehow wrong?

Does this conflict with any existing use of "wide" and "narrow"? e.g. Scala.

Regards,
-- Dave Keenan
Brisbane, Australia
Dave Keenan's Home Page *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1069

Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 02:54:32

Subject: Re: Naming intervals using Miracle

From: Dave Keenan

--- In tuning-math@y..., Herman Miller <hmiller@I...> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:13:19 -0700, David C Keenan <D.KEENAN@U...>
> wrote:
> 
> >35	483	 Ws4	Fv	
> >-6	500	  P4	F	3:4
> >25	517	 WP4	F^	
> 
> >-25	683	 nP5	Gv	
> >6	700	  P5	G	2:3
> >-35	717	 nS5	G^	
> 
> I like this scheme in general, but I don't see any reason to avoid 
"narrow
> perfect fourth" or "wide perfect fifth" (especially given that you 
have
> "WP4" and "nP5". These are slightly closer to just than the 5-TET 
fourths
> and fifths (which is about the limit of what I'd consider a good 
perfect
> fourth or fifth).

Good point. In 72-EDO, nP4 and Ws4 are indeed alternative names for 
the same interval. Ws4 is +35 generators and nP4 is -37 generators. 
The only time they might actually refer to different interval is on an 
open Miracle chain with 38 notes or more, or a closed one with more 
than 72 notes. So such distinctions are not really of any practical 
interest.

There are 21 (=3*31-72) intervals with alternative names like this in 
72-EDO. Then there are the alternative names allowed by the Fokker 
31-EDO system itself (like sd5 and A4 for 5:7). These carry over to 
the Miracle system as well.

Regards,
-- Dave Keenan


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1071

Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 14:34:23

Subject: some factorizations of commas and their divisions

From: monz

Just for fun, I decided to calculate the closest
superparticular rational approximations for other
divisions of a Pythagorean Comma (whose ratio will
be called "P") and Syntonic Comma (with ratio "S").
Here is a table of the first dozen of each:


P = (2^-19)*(3^12) = ~74/73

P^(1/2) = ~148/147
P^(1/3) = ~222/221
P^(1/4) = ~296/295
P^(1/5) = ~369/368
P^(1/6) = ~443/442
P^(1/7) = ~517/516
P^(1/8) = ~591/590
P^(1/9) = ~665/664
P^(1/10) = ~738/737
P^(1/11) = ~812/811
P^(1/12) = ~886/885


S = (2^-4)*(3^4)*(5^-1) = exactly 81/80

S^(1/2) = ~162/161
S^(1/3) = ~242/241
S^(1/4) = ~322/321
S^(1/5) = ~403/402
S^(1/6) = ~483/482
S^(1/7) = ~564/563
S^(1/8) = ~644/643
S^(1/9) = ~725/724
S^(1/10) = ~805/804
S^(1/11) = ~886/885
S^(1/12) = ~966/965


Notice that in this set of approximations, tempering by
P^(1/12), S^(1/11), and 886/885 all give the same result,
because P^(1/12) ~= S^(1/11). 


P^(1/12) is the interval measurement known as a "grad",
and it is very close in size to S/P, which is the "skhisma".
AFAIK, S^(1/11) does not have a name other than "1/11-comma".
Below is a comparison.


            grads        skhismas       cents    
   
S^(1/11) ~1.000059525  ~1.000714763  ~1.955117236
P^(1/12)  1.0          ~1.0006552    ~1.955000865.
S/P      ~0.999345229   1.0          ~1.953720788



prime-factorizations:

               2^     3^     5^

P^(1/12) = | -19/12  1      0    |
S^(1/11) = | -4/11   4/11  -1/11 |
S/P      = | -15     8      1    |


Note that 887/886 gives the closest superparticular rational
approximation to the skhisma.  2^(1/614) is a good EDO
approximation of all three of these intervals.


P^(1/5) can be factored as  2^(-19/5) * 3^(12/5), so
the Bach/wohltemperirt tempered "5th" of (3/2) / P^(1/5) can
be factored as 2^(14/5) * 3^-(7/5) .  The lowest-integer
ratio that comes close to it is 184/123, and 2395/1601 is
much closer.

The (4/3)^(1/30) version of moria can be factored as
2^(1/15) * 3^-(1/30) .  If the exponents of the Bach/wohltemperirt
"5th" are multiplied so that its denominators match these,
that interval is expressed as 2^(42/15) * 3^-(42/30), which
therefore shows that it is equal to exactly 42 of these morias,
or 4:3 "+" 12 morias.  [Note that there is another type of
moria which is 2^(1/72) ].


P^(1/4) can be factored as  2^(-19/4) * 3^3, so the
Werckmeister III tempered "5th" of (3/2) / P^(1/4) can
be factored as 2^(15/4) * 3^-2 .  It is very close to the 50-EDO
"5th" of 2^(29/50) [a more exact figure:  2^(29.00374993/50) ],
which was pointed out by Woolhouse as being nearly identical
with his "optimal" 7/26-comma meantone.  See:
W. S. B. Woolhouse's 'Essay on musical intervals', *




-monz
Yahoo! GeoCities *
"All roads lead to n^0"


 



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at Yahoo! Mail Setup *


top of page bottom of page up down


Message: 1073

Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:09:15

Subject: El Paso Microtonal Festival

From: John Chalmers

Erv Wilson and Jeniffer Stapher has asked me to circulate this notice
about the Microtone Conference in El Paso this November.


--John

Subject: RE: Please Reply to Confirm Your Participation!
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:43:52 EDT
From: Microtonezone@xxx.xxx
To: Microtonezone@xxx.xxx
CC: stapherthomas@xxxxxx.xxx

Dear
      The purpose of this email is to inform you that indeed we have secured
the El Paso International Museum of Art  for  November 1 - through November
4, 2001. We hope you find this information helpful.
      This is a lengthy document and we recommend that you print it,
fill it

out, email info and snail mail the final portion.

       Sonja  will be out of town on and off, so you will need to send your
                        info to me, Jeniffer Stapher
                               15308 Marburn
                         Horizon City, Texas 79928
                      Email- stapherthomas@xxxxxx.xxx
                        Phone Number- (915) 852-9315

                         Set Up and Take Down Times

Thursday-9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Friday-9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
Saturday-9:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m.
Saturday Afternoon-5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
Sunday-9:30 a.m. 2:00 p.m.

       Performance time blocks  are:
Thursday - Welcoming Night-7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.
Friday Matinee-1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Friday Evening - 7:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m.
Saturday Matinee-12 p.m. to 5 p.m.
Saturday Evening- 7:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m.

                                   Theater Info

     We have contracted to use the lower floor of the museum which includes
a small theater and several spacious galleries.

      The theater is vintage 1960s art deco revival and is in  near mint
condition, but has not been upgraded for new technology ! It has a small
lighted stage, a  booth, a ramp for truck access and 168 seats. Remember,
the
technology is of the 1960s, thus participants  must be responsible for
providing for their own equipment needs-outside of the basics!

                             Gallery Dimensions

#1- Front to Back- 25 feet
Side to Side- 18 feet

#2- Front to Back- 18 feet
Side to Side- 25 feet

#3- Front to Back- 29 feet
Side to Side- 30 feet

#4- Front to Back- 18 feet
Side to Side- 25 feet

#5- Teaching Space Across the Hall from the Theater
Front to Back- 33 feet
Side to Side- 29 feet

            Info We Need From You ASAP-Please email this data !
   If you have already provided this data, kindly do so again! Thank You!

Name
Address
Phone Number
Email Address
Field of Expertise
Bio or Web Site

                              Publicity MUSTS!
       Write a brief explanation of what microtonalism means to you!
    PR Photo- black & white or color- to be used for newspaper, magazine
                                 publicity

    Nature of Presentation (Lecture/Workshop/Demonstration/ Performance)
           Please let us know more about what you intend to do !

Theme of Presentation, instrument, theory, etc.!

Select Day(s) and Time(s) and Place (s) ( Refer to Schedule Performance Time

                 Blocks  and Theater / Gallery Info Above)

First Choice(s)-
Day(s)-
Time(s)-
Place(s)-
Second Choice(s)
Day(s)-
Time(s)-
Place(s)-
Alternate Choice (s)
Day(s)-
Time(s)-
Place(s)-

                       Confirming Your Participation

      In order to secure a place in this event you will need to send your
information by email or snail mail by August 1, 2001.

                                 Entry Fee
  An entry fee of $35.00 is due on or before September 14, 2001. Send your
             personal check, cashier's check or money order to
                               Sonja A. Wayne
                              3217 Suffolk Rd
                             El Paso, TX  79925
                                     or
                              Jeniffer Stapher

                    (Make checks out to Sonja A. Wayne)
 The purpose of the fee is to assist in covering the costs of the insurance,

             production and the publishing costs of this event.
                                 Questions?
                 You can call Sonja anytime (915) 591-3105
                     or email either Sonja or Jeniffer!
                                Thank You !
We thank you for your cooperation and look forward to future correspondence!



Sound Systems& Equipment

Crosby Sound, Lighting and Video:
"Reasonable rates for rental of sound, lighting, technical support
All major Credit cards accepeted"
Office # (915) 544-5996
24 hour answering service (915) 534-8268

DU MOTION Audio-Visual-Video Inc.
AudioVisual Sound systems
Wireless Microphones
Sound podiums
Rentals, Sales
1601 Montana
(915) 532-2760

Mesilla Valley Music Pro
Sound & Lighting
Toll Free Call
1-800-955-0251

Hotel
Cliff Inn Hotel and Conference Center
1600 East Cliff Drive
(915) 533-6700
$35.00 double bed-non-smoking
Christi Villegas manager
cell phone # ((15) 252-9390

The Cliff Inn is located very near the International Museum of Art, and is
in the Medical District El Pasoan's call, "Pill Hill". As you can see, they
are offering a wonderful rate- if this does not fit your fancy, there are
many hotels near the airport- Hilton, Radisson, Marriott, La Quinta, Travel
Lodge, Howard Johnson's etc!!!! 
If you need more info please email me!

Car Rentals
www.carrentalselpaso.com


top of page bottom of page up

Previous Next

1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950

1050 - 1075 -

top of page